Death Penalty Essay| Tips for Pros & Cons Argumentative Essay

Death Penalty Essay Introduction

This is a capital punishment offered by courts or even administrators for those guilty in some severe cases.

This is an age old practice and has been practiced in all parts of the world for centuries by kings, rulers and governments.

Death penalty is a punishment where in the person is put to death by force.

This in modern days is put by use either hanging, gun fire or even poison administration depending on the laws of the country.

In the past these punishments were even harsh as most of them were based on order of kings and monarchs.

But now due to voices of concerns of democracy and citizens of the countrydeath penalty essay, the methods are less violent.

Even it is said Jesus Christ was crucified and in some countries, beheading with sword is still practiced.

While other countries use gun fire and hanging practices.

There are international criticisms regarding this punishment.

Yet governments are not ready to oblige due to their own perceived reasons. So the essay can support the penalty or criticize it based on the points below.

Against Death Penalty Essay

Cons and arguments Against this penalty include

  1. Cruelty
  2. No suffering than instant pain
  3. Chances of punishing innocents
  4. Chances of loss of evidence
  5. Chances of vengeance


  1. Decrease in crime rate.
  2. Social acceptance of intensity of punishment to the guilty
  3. Minimal costs for the governments
  4. Elimination of criminals.

Cruelty: For many offenses like drug smuggling, theft etc, award of death penalty seems to be so cruel. Many critics argue that imprisonment or fines will be sufficient instead of direct death punishment. Because an offender might change his nature in future if he is given proper counseling or education. So it would be wiser to give them less harsh punishments and thereby give extra time for change in their attitude.

No suffering than instant pain: Some critics also view that death punishment is less harsher than life imprisonment. For those who caused intense pain to others for long duration, giving them a very brief pain as death punishment is so little and not desirable. For them it is correct to give long term pain like imprisonment long. This not only gives them pain in terms of loss of freedom, career and family but also a chance to change for better and even encourage them to serve the society.

Chances of punishing innocents: Sometimes innocents may be found guilty and given the harsh penalty. Latter if they are found to be innocent, then it would be too late to give them acquittal. Also many a times it is true that the personnel like police, lawyer involved in chasing the case will make mistakes. So, the ethics of non-punishment of innocent by law will be under question.

Chances of loss of evidence: In few countries, the punishment is given within short trial. In such cases there may not be sufficient time for the law to gain further evidence against others involved along with this convict. So avoidance of the penalty may give time for the law to further investigate the case.

Chances of vengeance: This is quite interesting and seems to have happened many times. The relatives and well-wishers of the convicts who are awarded the punishment seem to take revenge against the country or law by committing crimes against common public. There are many incidents of such happenings as a token of vengeance.

Death penalty persuasive essay

Pros and arguments in support of this penalty.

Decrease in crime rate: Death penalty was devised to create fear among those who tend to make crimes. So awarding the guilty with death penalty would decrease the crime rate as fear prevents from committing crimes. This is also true in many instances

Social acceptance of intensity of punishment to the guilty: The family members or well-wishers of the people who became victims of the crime act will be satisfied thinking justice is done of by award of such harsh punishment.

Minimal costs for the governments: Death penalty will decrease the cost of maintenance of the convicts. It is true that millions are spent to maintain and provide facilities to single offender sometimes. If this punishment is given, then all such maintenance is saved.

Elimination of criminals. If an offender is giving minimal punishment, there is chance that he gets out and commits further offense. He will be again convicted but again released. So the number of criminals will be as usual. Giving such punishments would minimize them.

Leave a Reply